For many complex surgical operations, research concludes that patients who seek care from a surgeon who performs a high number of such procedures (high-volume surgeons) have lower mortality rates than patients operated on by low-volume surgeons. As a health economist, I was interested in learning whether health care costs differ between high- and low-volume surgeons. Are the costs of a hospital stay for an operation performed by a high-volume surgeon higher than that for a low-volume surgeon? After all, customers often assume that price is a signal of quality.
Several years ago, I and Thomas Aloia, a surgeon at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, analyzed hospital discharge records for patients who underwent six complex cancer operations (ranging from colon resection to pancreatic resection) in the states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York between 1989 and 2000. We found that the cost of hospital stays for patients who were operated on by a high-volume surgeon were significantly lower than for surgeons who performed a small number of cancer operations each year. However, we did not know the underlying reason why this relationship existed.
Dr. Aloia and I were awarded an NIH grant to find out why higher volume surgeons were able to achieve lower health care costs. We published three papers from this grant, with the final paper providing the most illuminating results. Analyzing Medicare data from 2005 through 2009, we found that higher surgeon volume was associated with lower-cost hospital stays for four cancer operations: colectomy, rectal resection, pulmonary lobectomy, and pancreatic resection.
The largest cost savings occurred for pancreatic resection, which is the most complicated operation. Patients operated on by a surgeon in the 95th percentile for procedure volume (14 operations per year) had costs that were on average $3,286 lower than a surgeon in the 5th percentile (1 pancreatic resection per year). For the operation that is considered more straightforward, a colectomy, costs for the highest volume surgeons were $1,089 lower than for the lowest volume physicians.
In this study, we were able to identify the source of the cost differential. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had fewer instances of “processes of care” that are commonly used to address complications. These processes, including total parenteral nutrition, and critical care and inpatient consultations, raise the costs of a hospital stay between 14 and 34 percent. In fact, the higher need to deliver these processes of care to patients operated on by low-volume surgeons explained all of the volume-cost differential for colectomy and roughly half the difference for pancreatic resection.
Our analysis suggests that in the case of cancer surgery, higher price is not necessarily a signal of high quality. Instead, it may be an indicator of the need for costly care to address post-surgical complications. Patients may be better off seeking care from higher volume surgeons, not just because it’s better for their pocketbooks, but because they will receive better care.
What do these results suggest for health care policy? Most physicians are currently reimbursed under the fee-for-service system. Whether or not a surgeon performs an operation well or poorly, the fee the doctor receives from Medicare (or private insurers) remains the same. And if lower quality leads to more complications, then other physicians also receive additional compensation to address the resulting health care issues.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is gradually moving away from fee-for-service payments and towards value-based care. Providing a “bundled payment” to doctors and hospitals, where Medicare specifies a fixed reimbursement rate for all care associated with a treatment regardless of the actual costs of the hospital stay, will incentivize providers to deliver care with fewer costly complications.
However, efforts to make bundled payments mandatory for joint replacement and some cardiac care have been stalled by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. Nevertheless, CMS has been able to launch an Oncology Care Model, which introduces financial and performance accountability measures for many physician practices delivering chemotherapy to Medicare beneficiaries across the country. We are still awaiting to learn the results of this new model.
Our nation has spent the last few months in a tumultuous debate over who should and should not receive government-subsidized health insurance. Yet health insurance coverage has become so costly, because we have failed to focus on the factors that needlessly drive up costs in our health care system. We must change the way we reimburse and incentivize health care providers for the care that they deliver. Bundled payments and other types of value-based care are potentially powerful tools for simultaneously improving the quality of patient care and reducing healthcare spending. Only with such tools will we be able to achieve a sustainable health care system.
Dr. Vivian Ho is a member of the Texas Medical Center Health Policy Institute’s Executive Advisory Committee. Dr. Ho is the James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics at Rice University and the Director of the Center for Health and Biosciences at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
Our new, national survey explores how patients and doctors believe we can work together to improve the nation's health care system. RSVP for our FREE discussion of the results Nov. 12 at the @TXMedCenter https://t.co/CPE6Li96NV #healthpolicy
Our new, national survey explores how patients and doctors believe we can work together to improve the nation's health care system. RSVP for our FREE discussion of the results Nov. 12 at the Texas Medical Center. https://t.co/PxrBf6RsR6 #healthpolicy https://t.co/2iezf0KXUT
What do consumers think of Medicare-for-all? How much do doctors want to get paid? And how can we REALLY fix U.S. health care for good? Hear the results of our annual survey Nov. 12 in Houston #healthpolicy https://t.co/CPE6Li96NV https://t.co/43OdNIyoKj
We'll be speaking with @KPRC2Khambrel at 10:30 a.m. this morning on @KPRC2 in Houston. Can't wait to share findings from our new book, "Exposing the Medical Myths: Why Everything You Know about Health Care Is Wrong and How We Can Make It Right." #healthpolicy
Thanks for hosting us, @KPRC2Khambrel ! Be sure to watch Houston Newsmakers on @KPRC2 at 10:30 a.m. Sunday. We'll discuss our brand new book, "Exposing the Medical Myths: Why Everything You Know about Health Care Is Wrong and How We Can Make It Right." #healthpolicy https://t.co/VMQOadhvIL
The big day is here! Join us TONIGHT in Houston at the @TXMedCenter for a discussion of our institute’s brand new book that busts myths about US health care. More info and free registration at https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe #healthpolicy
Thanks for hosting us, @KOAColorado. Learn more about the book at https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe https://t.co/ga25VzsPQa
An American MRI costs 14 times an Australian one. An American hip replacement costs 80% more than a British one. Why the big difference? Join us Oct. 15 in Houston to discuss: https://t.co/MRV3NsoYnM https://t.co/iwk3drB6dl
Our brand new book highlights 20 big, pervasive myths about U.S. health care policy. What would you include on the list? Tell us using #healthcaremyths and join us at our book event in Houston Oct. 15 https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe https://t.co/7vtyoXZVUq
One of the big myths about US health care is that if you have a job, you can get insurance. What do you think are other myths and misunderstandings about US health care? Join us and discuss Oct. 15 in Houston https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe #healthcaremyths https://t.co/2t8JeWGA9T
Our new book’s title is a mouthful because we want you to know exactly what it's about. Learn more about “Exposing the Twenty Medical Myths: Why Everything You Know about Health Care Is Wrong and How to Make It Right” and RSVP for our talk in Houston. https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe https://t.co/qcgOblvad9
If you think the market can fix health care, think again. Without perfect information & perfect competition, this will be a challenge. Learn more in our new book published by @RLPGBooks https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe #healthpolicy https://t.co/uDc2gqVNWM
How much of US health care spending is wasteful? 10 percent? 25 percent? Try nearly a THIRD. We’ll discuss why it's so much at a discussion of our new book in Houston Oct. 15 https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe https://t.co/PulyEJeeZz
“The best way to increase the physician supply is to decrease retirement,” says Tim Garson, director of the @TXMedCenter Health Policy Institute. Hear the rest of our discussion with @HoustonPubMedia about the looming doctor shortage: https://t.co/uEtgi1KokE #healthpolicy https://t.co/aYfvW7cwtt
If you think the uninsured get adequate health care through the ER, think again. We bust that myth — and many more — in our new book “Exposing the Twenty Medical Myths.” Join us Oct. 15 in Houston to learn more: https://t.co/MRV3Ns7nwe https://t.co/wGxkThYxxZ