The “death spiral” occurs when not enough healthy people sign up for health insurance, causing rates to skyrocket so that, eventually, no one can afford insurance. The beginning of the death spiral occurred with Obamacare. The latest House and Senate plans just makes it worse.
Insurance is based on the idea that premiums paid by healthy people subsidize the needs of the unhealthy. The vast majority of us are going to get sick at some point (unless we die suddenly). Through health insurance, we bank that money away with the knowledge that it will be there in the future. We pay our premiums when we’re healthy so there are resources available when we’re sick.
But many people didn’t sign up for insurance through Obamacare because it was too expensive. In a Texas Medical Center-Nielsen survey conducted last year, we found that 87 percent of the uninsured who visited an Obamacare marketplace exchange said they couldn’t afford the coverage. That issue was a focal point of the 2016 presidential campaign and the debate about the future of Obamacare.
The new Senate bill provides little incentive for many healthy people to buy health insurance. Let’s begin with the paradox of “the pre-existing condition exclusion.” In the pre-Obamacare days, insurance companies could exclude coverage for treatment of pre-existing conditions like cancer. Doing so reduced costs to insurers. But that exclusion also encouraged healthy people to buy insurance “just in case” they had an accident, got pregnant or became chronically ill in the future. The Senate bill does not permit the pre-existing condition exclusion either, eliminating an incentive for healthy people to buy insurance.
The Senate bill removes the Obamacare “individual mandate” that penalizes individuals who don’t sign up for insurance. It removes Obamacare requirements that large employers offer insurance to employees. And it removes the provision in the House Obamacare repeal bill that requires individuals to maintain health insurance for a period of time in order to renew it at favorable rates.
The latest tweak to the Senate bill is designed to make people think twice about going without insurance. Under the bill, if someone who is uninsured for more than two months tries to purchase insurance, the insurer is required to impose a six-month waiting period before coverage kicks in. But the Congressional Budget Office estimates that provision would only “slightly” increase the number of people with insurance.
All of these factors will lead to the death spiral. After all, why would anyone buy expensive insurance now when they can wait to purchase it until they’re sick?
The Senate bill kills Medicaid expansion, too, and CBO estimates that Medicaid would be cut by $772 billion over 10 years. Are low income people doomed?
Maybe not. The Senate bill relates a government subsidy for health insurance premiums to age and income – it really hurts those over 39 and who make more than about $30,000. But those who earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $23,760 for a single person, can pay 2 percent of their income – about $40 per month — and the government will subsidize the rest of the premium. Here’s the rub and the opportunity – just what is in that insurance plan?
The new Senate bill removes Obamacare’s requirements around “essential health benefits” that require all insurance plans offered through the marketplace cover 10 core services such as hospitalizations and prescription. In the Senate bill, without those requirements, insurers are free to create whatever plans they want. They could re-create the insurance industry pre-Obamacare, when insurers were permitted to sell health plans that had extremely low benefits.
Insurance companies should create catastrophic plans with low deductibles. The design of the plans is not trivial. They might cover accidents and pregnancy, but when does the plan start covering cancer? Getting that balance right would be key. Few people would buy the plans if they don’t kick in when it really matters.
The trick is that these plans need to have reasonable premiums and low deductibles. Let’s not repeat the mistake of Obamacare, in which expensive benefits were required, resulting in often unaffordable deductibles. Insurers can stay afloat with these plans if healthy people want to buy them.
Whether or not the Senate bill becomes law, the concept should be carried forward. Low income people may not need Medicaid if they can afford to buy insurance that covers their needs.
Will they buy it even if they are healthy? We know that in our Texas Medical Center-Nielsen survey 96 percent of people across five states said they would buy insurance if it is affordable. Let’s give it to them and see.
Warning: file_get_contents(https://graph.facebook.com/HealthPolicyTMC/feed?fields=created_time,from,id,message,permalink_url,likes,shares,attachments&limit=3&access_token=1432365227004652|Vn2dI6PYV16dXXT0Oe-eAH5D9bI): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden in /home/tmcedu/public_html/wp-content/plugins/social-feed/includes/functions.php on line 608
Our new op-ed in @USATODAY @usatodayopinion makes the case for a "single-safety net" health care system. "If we want all Americans to have insurance coverage, everyone will need a safety net. But we don’t need to destroy the private insurance system." https://t.co/HV63kjgvtt
Join us next week as we debate some of the pivotal issues at the core of the 2018 campaign. https://t.co/EoejRWthy6 https://t.co/KQqnxLlxhJ
Excited to be at the @BakerInstitute this morning learning about how universal health care works in UK, Canada, Germany and Taiwan. Important topic to discuss with health care on the minds of so many US voters. #healthpolicy https://t.co/jVAHk5aiNT
Join us at our @TXMedCenter healthcare debate, where we'll discuss hot-button issues like "Medicare for all" with experts from @txwomans @CHCTexas @UTHealth @bcmhouston @McGovernMed @harrishealth @LegacyCommunity Oct. 25 in Houston. Free registration at https://t.co/EoejRWthy6 https://t.co/TvDokfzDIY
"Do we want our friends to take on second jobs if they get sick? Do we want family members to lose their retirement savings if they suffer an accident?" Citizens of other countries have answered 'no.' When will the U.S. make that choice?" via @TXMedCenter https://t.co/4SfYcqTfQG https://t.co/x471TEnGOo
New @POLITICO story includes coverage of our @TXMedCenter consumer survey: "Will Beto’s bet on Medicaid expansion pay off? Democrats’ past attempts to campaign on that issue fell flat, but there are signs this year might be different." #TMCsurvey https://t.co/REm5Yr3FpL https://t.co/YhE4xcq1iU
RT @TXMedCenter: Congratulations to @MDAndersonNews James Allison, Ph.D., who has jointly won the 2018 #NobelPrize in Physiology or Medicin…
Our latest op-ed in the @thehill uses new #TMCSurvey data to make that case that, if President Trump hopes to win in 2020, he'll have to make good on his promise to fix health care: https://t.co/6rREEQR1Em @TXMedCenter https://t.co/8sOSn418sm
What do you do when you receive an expensive medical bill? If you're like most people who took our #TMCSurvey, you don't pay right away. Read more at https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/3d4j1pFLFg
Huge news from our #TMCsurvey: Most Americans support completely banning tobacco sales. Read more at https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/7iPEUo8dJi
Our #TMCsurvey shows that Americans are increasingly supportive of 'Medicare for all' https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/4oUMFFUFsX
With Election Day less than two months away, health care is poised to be a major issue for voters. #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi959lxm https://t.co/znh5Gcq6rW
It's almost happy hour. Would you support this plan to improve road safety? #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi959lxm https://t.co/yN8VVduuaB
What's been your experience when you bring up costs with your doctor? #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/LLAuUk6Bwg
If you avoid paying expensive medical bills right away, you're not alone. #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/dTkyqwnXHn