Look for health care to take center stage during the upcoming presidential debates. The two candidates and their parties have taken opposing viewpoints on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – one wants to keep it and the other wants to repeal it. There is actually a middle ground.
Since the ACA became law in 2010, 20 million more Americans have health insurance and health care cost growth has slowed. But myriad problems still exist. I believe the majority of Democrats and Republicans – by definition, those in the middle of the policy spectrum – would like to see major fixes to the ACA without repeal, but what would it take to get there?
Here are three critical problems and corresponding solutions that would not require repeal:
1. How affordable is the Affordable Care Act? In the recent Texas Medical Center Nielsen Survey, 85 percent of respondents across 5 states (California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Texas) said they wanted universal health care coverage. However, 87 percent of the uninsured who visited the health exchanges could not afford to pay the premium and out-of-pocket expenses in plans offered on the exchange marketplace.
We all agree that we spend too much on health care. In fact, we waste about one-third of our health care dollars – that’s almost $1 trillion per year including $192 billion on “overtreatment.” For example, seven times the rate of heart procedures are done in West Virginia than in San Francisco. The patients in West Virginia are no sicker and have the same end result, i.e. many in West Virginia likely did not need the procedure and were “overtreated.” There are a number of possible reasons for this overtreatment, but a prominent one is that the doctors doing these procedures are paid for each one – so called “fee-for-service.” In the majority of cases, physicians are not consciously making the decision to overtreat, but we do know that fee-for-service is associated with overtreatment.
A fix: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS, the largest payer in the U.S.) has committed to changing the way physicians are paid by 2018. One way to do that is to pay physicians a salary – just like at the renowned Mayo and Cleveland clinics – where they have the highest quality health care and a lower overall price. But Mayo and Cleveland don’t skimp on paying their physicians and that is not what I am suggesting. CMS clearly has the concept right to pay for quality, but paying doctors a salary plus a bonus for quality is a lot simpler than the highly complex way they are currently considering. Not to mention the CMS proposal leaves fee-for-service in place, which is a bad idea.
2. U.S. citizens with the lowest incomes are uninsured in 40 percent of the country. Before the ACA, if a person was between 19 and 64 years old and without children, even if she or he had very low income, Medicaid did not cover them and there was no program for health care coverage. Now with the ACA, Medicaid can be extended to cover those people. However, the Supreme Court decided that states have the option not to expand Medicaid, again leaving the lowest income citizens without a safety net for health care. Today 19 states have not expanded Medicaid for various reasons.
A fix: The federal government should consider new ways of covering this group of people, while not adding to the Medicaid roles. By creating a new program that combines Medicaid dollars with funding for subsidies in the health care exchange, this program could accomplish the same goals without being labeled “Medicaid expansion.” Alternatively, the state could privatize the marketplace exchange and the marketplace could receive federal dollars, covering the uninsured with commercial plans.
3. The insurance mandates are unpopular. No one likes to be told what to do – neither Democrats nor Republicans. However, the fact is that people who do not need insurance today must subsidize those who do; there’s no way around it. Remember the “pre-existing condition exclusion”? Everyone hated it, and it should be buried, but it was a way to incentivize people who did not need insurance today to buy it, knowing that at some point in the future, they would get sick or have a serious accident and need insurance. With the pre-existing condition gone, thankfully, there must be a way to incentivize people to buy insurance.
A fix: The ACA should require catastrophic coverage, as that is really what insurance is about – covering serious diseases and accidents. But preventive care should also be covered.
What’s in this for all of us? With more pressure on quality in health care, maybe the eight-minute doctor visit will be a thing of the past. Maybe with more people having public or private insurance, the mandates will be less of a burden.
Tune in to the presidential debates, and you’ll see health care emerge as a topic. The partisan mud-slinging will occur, but whoever is elected will face the reality that bipartisan fixes are necessary. The health of our country is too important.
Originally published on Huffington Post
We spoke with @KPRC2 @KPRC2Haley about why we believe the cost of health care is poised to be a pivotal issue in the 2018 mid-term elections: https://t.co/s4ReUttbby @TXMedCenter https://t.co/yGlQ2GrGau
Our new op-ed in @USATODAY @usatodayopinion makes the case for a "single-safety net" health care system. "If we want all Americans to have insurance coverage, everyone will need a safety net. But we don’t need to destroy the private insurance system." https://t.co/HV63kjgvtt
Join us next week as we debate some of the pivotal issues at the core of the 2018 campaign. https://t.co/EoejRWthy6 https://t.co/KQqnxLlxhJ
Excited to be at the @BakerInstitute this morning learning about how universal health care works in UK, Canada, Germany and Taiwan. Important topic to discuss with health care on the minds of so many US voters. #healthpolicy https://t.co/jVAHk5aiNT
Join us at our @TXMedCenter healthcare debate, where we'll discuss hot-button issues like "Medicare for all" with experts from @txwomans @CHCTexas @UTHealth @bcmhouston @McGovernMed @harrishealth @LegacyCommunity Oct. 25 in Houston. Free registration at https://t.co/EoejRWthy6 https://t.co/TvDokfzDIY
"Do we want our friends to take on second jobs if they get sick? Do we want family members to lose their retirement savings if they suffer an accident?" Citizens of other countries have answered 'no.' When will the U.S. make that choice?" via @TXMedCenter https://t.co/4SfYcqTfQG https://t.co/x471TEnGOo
New @POLITICO story includes coverage of our @TXMedCenter consumer survey: "Will Beto’s bet on Medicaid expansion pay off? Democrats’ past attempts to campaign on that issue fell flat, but there are signs this year might be different." #TMCsurvey https://t.co/REm5Yr3FpL https://t.co/YhE4xcq1iU
RT @TXMedCenter: Congratulations to @MDAndersonNews James Allison, Ph.D., who has jointly won the 2018 #NobelPrize in Physiology or Medicin…
Our latest op-ed in the @thehill uses new #TMCSurvey data to make that case that, if President Trump hopes to win in 2020, he'll have to make good on his promise to fix health care: https://t.co/6rREEQR1Em @TXMedCenter https://t.co/8sOSn418sm
What do you do when you receive an expensive medical bill? If you're like most people who took our #TMCSurvey, you don't pay right away. Read more at https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/3d4j1pFLFg
Huge news from our #TMCsurvey: Most Americans support completely banning tobacco sales. Read more at https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/7iPEUo8dJi
Our #TMCsurvey shows that Americans are increasingly supportive of 'Medicare for all' https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/4oUMFFUFsX
With Election Day less than two months away, health care is poised to be a major issue for voters. #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi959lxm https://t.co/znh5Gcq6rW
It's almost happy hour. Would you support this plan to improve road safety? #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi959lxm https://t.co/yN8VVduuaB
What's been your experience when you bring up costs with your doctor? #TMCsurvey https://t.co/Djxi95qWVW https://t.co/LLAuUk6Bwg