For many complex surgical operations, research concludes that patients who seek care from a surgeon who performs a high number of such procedures (high-volume surgeons) have lower mortality rates than patients operated on by low-volume surgeons. As a health economist, I was interested in learning whether health care costs differ between high- and low-volume surgeons. Are the costs of a hospital stay for an operation performed by a high-volume surgeon higher than that for a low-volume surgeon? After all, customers often assume that price is a signal of quality.
Several years ago, I and Thomas Aloia, a surgeon at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, analyzed hospital discharge records for patients who underwent six complex cancer operations (ranging from colon resection to pancreatic resection) in the states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York between 1989 and 2000. We found that the cost of hospital stays for patients who were operated on by a high-volume surgeon were significantly lower than for surgeons who performed a small number of cancer operations each year. However, we did not know the underlying reason why this relationship existed.
Dr. Aloia and I were awarded an NIH grant to find out why higher volume surgeons were able to achieve lower health care costs. We published three papers from this grant, with the final paper providing the most illuminating results. Analyzing Medicare data from 2005 through 2009, we found that higher surgeon volume was associated with lower-cost hospital stays for four cancer operations: colectomy, rectal resection, pulmonary lobectomy, and pancreatic resection.
The largest cost savings occurred for pancreatic resection, which is the most complicated operation. Patients operated on by a surgeon in the 95th percentile for procedure volume (14 operations per year) had costs that were on average $3,286 lower than a surgeon in the 5th percentile (1 pancreatic resection per year). For the operation that is considered more straightforward, a colectomy, costs for the highest volume surgeons were $1,089 lower than for the lowest volume physicians.
In this study, we were able to identify the source of the cost differential. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had fewer instances of “processes of care” that are commonly used to address complications. These processes, including total parenteral nutrition, and critical care and inpatient consultations, raise the costs of a hospital stay between 14 and 34 percent. In fact, the higher need to deliver these processes of care to patients operated on by low-volume surgeons explained all of the volume-cost differential for colectomy and roughly half the difference for pancreatic resection.
Our analysis suggests that in the case of cancer surgery, higher price is not necessarily a signal of high quality. Instead, it may be an indicator of the need for costly care to address post-surgical complications. Patients may be better off seeking care from higher volume surgeons, not just because it’s better for their pocketbooks, but because they will receive better care.
What do these results suggest for health care policy? Most physicians are currently reimbursed under the fee-for-service system. Whether or not a surgeon performs an operation well or poorly, the fee the doctor receives from Medicare (or private insurers) remains the same. And if lower quality leads to more complications, then other physicians also receive additional compensation to address the resulting health care issues.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is gradually moving away from fee-for-service payments and towards value-based care. Providing a “bundled payment” to doctors and hospitals, where Medicare specifies a fixed reimbursement rate for all care associated with a treatment regardless of the actual costs of the hospital stay, will incentivize providers to deliver care with fewer costly complications.
However, efforts to make bundled payments mandatory for joint replacement and some cardiac care have been stalled by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. Nevertheless, CMS has been able to launch an Oncology Care Model, which introduces financial and performance accountability measures for many physician practices delivering chemotherapy to Medicare beneficiaries across the country. We are still awaiting to learn the results of this new model.
Our nation has spent the last few months in a tumultuous debate over who should and should not receive government-subsidized health insurance. Yet health insurance coverage has become so costly, because we have failed to focus on the factors that needlessly drive up costs in our health care system. We must change the way we reimburse and incentivize health care providers for the care that they deliver. Bundled payments and other types of value-based care are potentially powerful tools for simultaneously improving the quality of patient care and reducing healthcare spending. Only with such tools will we be able to achieve a sustainable health care system.
Dr. Vivian Ho is a member of the Texas Medical Center Health Policy Institute’s Executive Advisory Committee. Dr. Ho is the James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics at Rice University and the Director of the Center for Health and Biosciences at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
Join us Jan. 15 as we kick off our 2019 @TXMedCenter Health Policy Course with a special, interactive session: "Debunking the Health Policy Myths." Featuring experts from @txwomans @CHCTexas @UTexasSPH. Free registration at https://t.co/4jEzrQ8wlF https://t.co/SHEaBZBEKQ
Join us in Galveston at @utmbhealth Dec. 13-14 for the 2nd Annual Conference on the Health of Migrants. We're joining partners @DocsForChangeTX and @Oxfam to encourage understanding of this crucial topic. https://t.co/SuXhVi3fPi https://t.co/XXJqOv0eCi
Coming up next month: the 2019 @TXMedCenter Health Policy Course. Every week, you'll learn about the most pressing issues in health policy. Best of all: it's free. https://t.co/Hg24jPDj1Q https://t.co/4qRpZbFcJ8
Coming up: The 2nd Conference on the Health of Migrants at @utmbhealth in Galveston, Dec. 13-14. Hear the latest research on this critical topic. To register or learn more, visit https://t.co/KyQYJpydqp https://t.co/eO12mOdwNK
Did you know 1 in 5 uninsured children lives in the U.S.? @HoustonPubMedia spoke with our director Dr. Tim Garson, along with leaders from @Health4Texas, @CHCTexas, and @TXMedCenter about this troubling trend https://t.co/tEKDaIEaax https://t.co/cHBhHEIXdM
ICYMI: The feds are moving towards a policy that would make it harder for minors to access flavored e-cigarette products. Our annual #TMCsurvey found 65% of respondents favor banning candy and fruit flavoring in e-cigarettes/vaping products. https://t.co/IvIJNTGN1x https://t.co/JyfwBDd9bq
We just published the dates of our 2019 TMC Health Policy Course, which starts in less than two months. You'll learn a lot, and best of all, it's FREE to attend. Click to register. https://t.co/Hg24jPDj1Q @TXMedCenter https://t.co/eY0b6Ryr3W
Three states yesterday voted to expand Medicaid coverage. Not a surprise: our survey results show that nationwide, there's widespread support for opening up Medicaid to more people. https://t.co/PQDBoayCAQ https://t.co/OtMXLgZ6bM
Health policy and medicine meet space at this free event at @UHLAW tomorrow featuring Astronaut Lee M. Morin https://t.co/XDLKDjNnUZ https://t.co/P0hSULV4tu
"Short-term health insurance should worry you even if you don’t need it." Our colleague Vivian Ho writes for @statnews about the new health insurance plans that threaten to cause big problems https://t.co/3vr9VVGnB7 @HealthEconTX @BakerInstitute @TXMedCenter https://t.co/174pMwPje5
We've got a wonderful crowd tonight at our Great Health Care Debate here at the @TXMedCenter. We're discussing, debating, and arguing about some of the most important issues facing voters, two weeks before Election Day. Follow along at #TMCdebate. https://t.co/2KivWtdFo2
We're making last minute preparations for our Great Health Care Debate! Join us at 5:30 pm TONIGHT at @ThirdCoastHou and follow the conversation using #TMCDebate. Free registration https://t.co/z4Zu8ZhaFb @TXMedCenter https://t.co/sLtYo9fUcB
@ENDHIVHou Unfortunately this one isn't being livestreamed or recorded.
How drunk is too drunk to drive? Utah will soon lower its blood alcohol threshold while driving from .08 to .05. We think other states should do the same — and more. Our #TMCsurvey shows most Americans agree. Read our latest in @GOVERNING @gov_institute https://t.co/2UsZpfpy66 https://t.co/xjsNHdrt0V
We spoke with @KPRC2 @KPRC2Haley about why we believe the cost of health care is poised to be a pivotal issue in the 2018 mid-term elections: https://t.co/s4ReUttbby @TXMedCenter https://t.co/yGlQ2GrGau